← All Authorities
Australia australian consumer lawmisleading deceptive conductconsumer guarantees

ACCC v Valve Corporation (No 3)

[2016] FCA 196
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtFederal Court of Australia
Year2016
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Valve Corporation was found to have engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct by representing to Australian consumers that they had no right to a refund for games purchased on Steam, contrary to the consumer guarantees under the ACL.

Area of Law

consumer

Related Cases

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Google LLC (No 2) (2021) 391 ALR 346
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Kobelt (2019) 267 CLR 1
ACCC v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd (2016) 340 ALR 25

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of ACCC v Valve Corporation (No 3) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain ACCC v Valve Corporation (No 3...