CommonBench is not another AI chatbot running prompts against a language model. It's a legal intelligence system built on a comprehensive database of real legal work — from the lawyers who win the cases that matter.
Our system is trained on a comprehensive database of legal work product sourced from international law firms, King's Counsel in England and Wales, Senior Counsel in Hong Kong, Singapore and Australia, and leading litigation practices in the United States.
This means when our AI agents analyse your case, they're not generating generic responses from a language model. They're drawing on the same analytical frameworks, drafting patterns, and strategic thinking that the best lawyers in the world actually use.
Skeleton arguments drafted to the standard a High Court judge expects. Witness statements that read like a silk prepared them. Procedural strategies that exploit every advantage the rules provide. That's what our database enables — and that's what you get.
When you submit a case, it's not processed by a single AI model. It's reviewed by a multi-agent system — a panel of specialised AI agents, each trained to analyse from a different perspective:
A Procedural Strategist identifies timing advantages and filing opportunities. A Substantive Analyst examines the legal merits. A Costs Assessor evaluates your financial exposure. A Settlement Strategist scores your leverage. A Defence Architect anticipates what the other side will argue. A Precedent Finder searches across five jurisdictions for binding and persuasive authority.
Then they debate each other — stress-testing their conclusions, challenging assumptions, and refining the analysis until a consensus emerges. The result is work product with the depth and rigour of a senior counsel's chambers — not a chatbot's best guess.
Our legal intelligence system draws on real work product across every major practice area and procedure type. This is what separates us from every other legal AI on the market.
Written submissions from KCs, SCs, and senior advocates across all five jurisdictions. Our system knows what judges expect to see — structure, tone, authority citation, and persuasive technique.
Statements of claim, defences, counterclaims, replies, interlocutory applications — drafted by top litigation firms. Our system replicates their precision and procedural awareness.
The art of a good witness statement is making the deponent's voice come through while the legal structure remains invisible. Our database captures how the best silks achieve this.
Internal strategy documents, risk assessments, settlement analyses, and tactical advice from senior partners and counsel. The thinking behind the cases, not just the filings.
Curated and annotated case law across five jurisdictions — not just the decisions, but analysis of how courts apply principles, distinguish facts, and develop the law.
Oral argument outlines, cross-examination frameworks, and hearing preparation materials from experienced advocates. How to control the narrative in court.
Federal courts, NY, CA, DE, TX
England & Wales, Scotland
Federal, NSW, VIC, QLD, WA
High Court, State Courts, ECT
CFI, District Court, CA, CFA
Submit your case and experience legal analysis with the depth of senior counsel — at a fraction of the cost.
Submit Your Case →