← All Authorities
Australia Leading Case anti competitive agreements

ACCC v Yazaki Corp

(2018) 262 CLR 203
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtFull Federal Court of Australia
Year2018
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Full Federal Court set aside and recalculated cartel conduct penalties, establishing key principles for penalty assessment under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth).

Key Principle

international cartel; automotive wire harnesses; penalties for giving effect to cartel provision; extraterritorial application of Competition and Consumer Act

Area of Law

competition

Related Cases

ACCC v Pacific National Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 77

Full Federal Court considered the test for substantially lessening competition under s.50 CCA in the context of a rail freight acquisition.

ACCC v Yazaki Corporation (2018) 262 CLR 1

HCA upheld record cartel penalties for wire harness market conduct, affirming that penalties must deter contravener and others, considering nature, extent, and duration of cartel.

ACCC v Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 78

Full Federal Court considered whether Pfizer's patent evergreening strategy in the pharmaceutical market constituted misuse of market power under s 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of ACCC v Yazaki Corp and how it applies to your situation.

Explain ACCC v Yazaki Corp