← All Authorities
Singapore amenability and standinggrounds illegality

Adri Anton Kalangie v Attorney-General

[2012] SGHC 110
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore High Court
Year2012
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Habeas corpus application examining lawfulness of immigration detention pending removal under the Singapore Immigration Act and procedural requirements thereof.

Key Principle

immigration detention; habeas corpus; lawfulness of detention pending removal; procedural requirements under Immigration Act

Area of Law

immigration

Related Cases

Minister for Immigration v NZYQ [2023] HCA 37

Executive detention of non-citizens is only lawful where removal is reasonably practicable; indefinite detention where removal is not possible is constitutionally invalid, effectively overruling Al-Kateb.

Minister for Immigration v Vunilagi [2023] HCA 24

HCA considered s 80 Constitution guarantee of trial by jury and the Kable principle as they apply to territory courts and territory criminal proceedings.

Alexander v Minister for Home Affairs (Character Cancellation) [2022] HCA 19

Ministerial discretion to cancel a visa on character grounds must be exercised according to statutory criteria and is subject to judicial review for legal error.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Adri Anton Kalangie v Attorney-General and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Adri Anton Kalangie v Attorney...