← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case trial procedurerule of law

Al Rawi v Security Service

[2011] UKSC 34
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK Supreme Court
Year2011
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Courts cannot order a closed material procedure in ordinary civil litigation without statutory authority, as CMP fundamentally conflicts with the open justice principle.

Key Principle

closed material procedure; open justice principle; Supreme Court cannot order CMP absent statutory authority

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Al Rawi v Security Service and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Al Rawi v Security Service