← All Authorities
United States racial gerrymanderingredistricting

Alexander v South Carolina State Conference of NAACP

602 U.S. 1 (2024)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Year2024
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

In a racial-gerrymandering challenge a legislature is entitled to a presumption of good faith, and a plaintiff alleging that race rather than permissible partisan considerations predominated in drawing a district bears a demanding burden that ordinarily requires producing an alternative map achieving the legislature's political goals with greater racial balance.

Area of Law

constitutional

Related Cases

Trump v Anderson Trump v. Anderson, 601 U.S. 100 (2024)
Rahimi v United States United States v. Rahimi, 602 U.S. 680 (2024) (No. 22-915)
United States v Rahimi (DV Firearms) 602 U.S. 680 (2024)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Alexander v South Carolina State Conference of NAACP and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Alexander v South Carolina Sta...