← All Authorities
Singapore professional negligenceimplied terms

Anwar Patrick Adrian v Ng Chong & Hue LLC

[2014] 3 SLR 761
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2014
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A solicitor owes a duty of care to their client in both contract and tort concurrently, and breach of that duty gives rise to liability in either cause of action.

Key Principle

solicitor's duty of care to client; concurrent liability in contract and tort

Area of Law

tort

Related Cases

Bird v DP (A Pseudonym) (2024) 98 ALJR 486

High Court of Australia held a religious organisation vicariously liable for sexual abuse by a priest, recognising a relationship akin to employment sufficient to ground vicarious liability.

Bryant v Badenoch Integrated Logging Pty Ltd (2023) 278 CLR 99

High Court of Australia held that the peak indebtedness rule does not apply when assessing unfair preferences under s 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

Kozarov v Victoria (2022) 275 CLR 115

An employer owes a duty to take reasonable steps to protect an employee from psychiatric injury caused by vicarious trauma, and may breach that duty by failing to act on obvious warning signs.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Anwar Patrick Adrian v Ng Chong & Hue LLC and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Anwar Patrick Adrian v Ng Chon...