← All Authorities
Singapore solicitor duty to third partypure economic losssolicitors

Anwar Patrick Adrian v Ng Chong & Hue LLC

[2014] 3 SLR 761; [2014] SGCA 34
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2014
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

A solicitor may owe a duty of care in tort to a non-client third party (here, the client's sons whom the client intended to benefit) for negligently causing pure economic loss, the existence of such a duty being determined by the two-stage Spandeck test (informed by the assumption-of-responsibility reasoning of White v Jones) rather than by an automatic contractual relationship.

Area of Law

tort

Related Cases

Noor Azlin bte Abdul Rahman v Changi General Hospital Pte Ltd [2021] 2 SLR 440
I-Admin (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Hong Ying Ting [2020] 1 SLR 1130
MAN Diesel & Turbo SE v IM Skaugen SE [2019] SGCA 80

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Anwar Patrick Adrian v Ng Chong & Hue LLC and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Anwar Patrick Adrian v Ng Chon...