← All Authorities
United States standingindirect purchaserplatforms

Apple Inc v Pepper

587 U.S. 273 (2019)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Year2019
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Consumers who buy a product directly from an allegedly monopolistic retailer are 'direct purchasers' with antitrust standing under Illinois Brick, so iPhone owners who buy apps directly from Apple's App Store may sue Apple for monopolization, regardless that independent developers set the app prices.

Area of Law

competition

Related Cases

US v Google LLC (Search Antitrust) United States v. Google LLC, No. 1:20-cv-03010 (APM) (D.D.C. Aug. 5, 2024) (liability); remedies opinion Sept. 2, 2025
Epic Games Inc v Apple Inc (Supreme Court) Nos. 23-337 and 23-344 (cert. denied Jan. 16, 2024)
Epic Games Inc v Apple Inc 67 F.4th 946 (9th Cir. 2023)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Apple Inc v Pepper and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Apple Inc v Pepper