← All Authorities
Hong Kong foreign arbitral awards new york convention

Astro Nusantara International BV v PT Ayunda Prima Mitra

[2018] HKCFI 2168
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of First Instance
Year2018
StatusBinding authority

Summary

HK court considered enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under the New York Convention, addressing grounds for refusal of enforcement.

Key Principle

enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under the New York Convention in HK

Area of Law

Arbitration

Related Cases

TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 251 CLR 533

Enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) is constitutionally valid and grounds for refusal are strictly limited.

Pacific China Holdings Ltd v Grand Pacific Holdings Ltd (2012) 15 HKCFAR 296

CFA affirmed a pro-enforcement approach to arbitration clauses under the Arbitration Ordinance, requiring courts to give effect to arbitration agreements broadly.

China Nanhai Oil Joint Service Corp v Gee Tai Holdings Co Ltd [1994] 3 HKC 375

Establishes the basis for enforcement of Mainland Chinese arbitral awards in Hong Kong under cross-border arbitration recognition principles.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Astro Nusantara International BV v PT Ayunda Prima Mitra and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Astro Nusantara International ...