← All Authorities
Singapore amenability and standing

Attorney-General v Ting Choon Meng

[2017] 1 SLR 373
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2017
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Singapore Court of Appeal clarified the sufficient interest test for standing in judicial review and the availability of collateral challenge to administrative action.

Key Principle

judicial review; standing; sufficient interest test; locus standi for collateral challenge to administrative action

Area of Law

public-law

Related Cases

CPCF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 255 CLR 514

The Maritime Powers Act 2013 authorised detention and return of asylum seekers at sea; executive power extends to removal of non-citizens from Australian waters.

Isbester v Knox City Council (2015) 255 CLR 135

A reasonable apprehension of bias arises where a council officer who lodged a complaint against a dog owner also participated in the decision to order destruction of the dog.

Plaintiff M47/2012 v Director-General of Security (2012) 251 CLR 1

Ministerial power to detain and remove non-citizens under the Migration Act must be exercised in accordance with the Act; adverse ASIO security assessments do not compel indefinite detention.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Attorney-General v Ting Choon Meng and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Attorney-General v Ting Choon ...