← All Authorities
Australia intimidation and economic tortsrule of law

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union

(2018) 262 CLR 157
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Year2018
StatusBinding authority

Summary

HCA upheld record penalties for unlawful industrial action under the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act, affirming penalties must reflect contravention seriousness.

Key Principle

The HCA upheld record penalties for industrial action in breach of the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act; the penalties must reflect the seriousness of the contravention.

Area of Law

employment

Related Cases

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd (2022) 275 CLR 165

Employee/independent contractor characterisation is determined by the legal rights and obligations in the written contract, not the totality of the relationship.

ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek (2022) 275 CLR 215

HCA confirmed that employee/contractor distinction is determined by contractual terms alone, rejecting the multi-factorial totality-of-relationship test.

WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato (2021) 271 CLR 456

A casual employee's status is determined by the contractual terms at engagement; regularity of work pattern does not transform casual employment into permanent employment.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Australian Building and Constr...