← All Authorities
United Kingdom breach standard of careduty of careprofessional negligence

Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Ltd

[2011] UKSC 17
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK Supreme Court
Year2011
StatusBinding authority

Summary

An employer who complied with prevailing industry standards for noise exposure at the relevant time did not breach its duty of care, as liability turns on reasonable foreseeability at the time of exposure.

Key Principle

noise-induced hearing loss; employer's duty of care; compliance with prevailing industry standards at time of exposure; reasonable foreseeability

Area of Law

employment

Related Cases

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd (2022) 275 CLR 165

Employee/independent contractor characterisation is determined by the legal rights and obligations in the written contract, not the totality of the relationship.

ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek (2022) 275 CLR 215

HCA confirmed that employee/contractor distinction is determined by contractual terms alone, rejecting the multi-factorial totality-of-relationship test.

WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato (2021) 271 CLR 456

A casual employee's status is determined by the contractual terms at engagement; regularity of work pattern does not transform casual employment into permanent employment.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Baker v Quantum Clothing Group...