← All Authorities
United States Leading Case pure economic losscausation legal remoteness

Bank of America Corp v City of Miami

581 U.S. 189 (2017)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2017
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Municipalities have standing under the Fair Housing Act to sue banks for predatory lending causing reduced property tax revenue, subject to a proximate cause requirement.

Key Principle

Fair Housing Act; municipalities have standing to sue banks for predatory lending causing reduced property tax revenue; proximate cause requirement

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 272 CLR 1

A bank owes a duty of care to guarantors to take reasonable steps to ensure they understand the nature and effect of the guarantee under the Code of Banking Practice.

AUSTRAC v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] FCA 930

CBA liable for systemic AML/CTF Act contraventions including failure to report suspicious matters and threshold transactions via intelligent deposit machines, resulting in $700 million civil penalty.

Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Full Federal Court) (2015) 236 FCR 199

Full Federal Court held that bank late payment fees were not penalties or unconscionable under consumer protection law as they bore a genuine pre-estimate of loss or legitimate commercial interest.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Bank of America Corp v City of Miami and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Bank of America Corp v City of...