← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case causation factualcausation legal remoteness

Barker v Corus UK Ltd

[2006] UKHL 20
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK House of Lords
Year2006
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Where multiple defendants materially contributed to the risk of mesothelioma, liability is proportionate to the period of exposure rather than joint and several.

Key Principle

proportionate liability where material contribution to risk applies

Area of Law

Tort — Causation, Remoteness and Damages

Related Cases

Chester v Afshar [2004] UKHL 41

In informed consent cases, causation is satisfied on a policy basis even where the claimant cannot prove they would have avoided surgery but-for the failure to warn.

Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22

Where multiple tortfeasors each materially contributed to the risk of harm, proof of material contribution to risk suffices to establish causation in negligence.

Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v The Miller Steamship Co (Wagon Mound No 2) [1967] 1 AC 617

A defendant is liable in tort where damage of the relevant type was foreseeable, even if the risk of it occurring was very small.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Barker v Corus UK Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Barker v Corus UK Ltd