← All Authorities
Australia Leading Case strike out and summary judgmentcase management

Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW

(2006) 226 CLR 256
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Year2006
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A court may permanently stay proceedings as an abuse of process where delay has caused such serious unfairness to the defendant that a fair trial is no longer possible.

Key Principle

permanent stay for abuse of process; delay causing unfairness; court's inherent jurisdiction

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Batistatos v Roads and Traffic...