← All Authorities
Hong Kong foreign judgments statutory

Beijing Renji Real Estate Development Group Co., Ltd v Zhu Min

[2024] HKCA 878
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of Appeal
Year2024
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Court of Appeal clarified the meaning of 'Court Agreement' under the Mainland Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Ordinance for enforcement of mainland judgments in HK.

Key Principle

The Court of Appeal clarified the meaning of 'Court Agreement' under The Mainland Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Ordinance.

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Beijing Renji Real Estate Development Group Co., Ltd v Zhu Min and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Beijing Renji Real Estate Deve...