← All Authorities
United States trial procedure

Berger v North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP

597 U.S. 179 (2022)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2022
StatusBinding authority

Summary

State legislative leaders have a right to intervene to defend state law in federal court when the attorney general declines to do so.

Key Principle

intervention; state legislative leaders can intervene to defend state law when attorney general declines

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Berger v North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Berger v North Carolina State ...