← All Authorities
United States Leading Case grounds illegalityseparation of powers

Biden v Nebraska (Student Loans)

600 US 477 (2023)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2023
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Major questions doctrine requires clear congressional authorisation for agency actions of vast economic and political significance; HEROES Act did not authorise mass student loan forgiveness.

Key Principle

The HEROES Act does not authorise the Secretary of Education's $430 billion student loan forgiveness program; the major questions doctrine requires clear congressional authorisation for actions of such economic magnitude.

Area of Law

public-law

Related Cases

CPCF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 255 CLR 514

The Maritime Powers Act 2013 authorised detention and return of asylum seekers at sea; executive power extends to removal of non-citizens from Australian waters.

Isbester v Knox City Council (2015) 255 CLR 135

A reasonable apprehension of bias arises where a council officer who lodged a complaint against a dog owner also participated in the decision to order destruction of the dog.

Plaintiff M47/2012 v Director-General of Security (2012) 251 CLR 1

Ministerial power to detain and remove non-citizens under the Migration Act must be exercised in accordance with the Act; adverse ASIO security assessments do not compel indefinite detention.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Biden v Nebraska (Student Loans) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Biden v Nebraska (Student Loan...