← All Authorities
Australia Leading Case vicarious liabilitynon delegable duties

Bird v DP (A Pseudonym)

(2024) 98 ALJR 486
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Year2024
StatusBinding authority

Summary

High Court of Australia held a religious organisation vicariously liable for sexual abuse by a priest, recognising a relationship akin to employment sufficient to ground vicarious liability.

Key Principle

vicarious liability of religious organisation for sexual abuse; relationship akin to employment; non-delegable duty of care

Area of Law

tort

Related Cases

Bryant v Badenoch Integrated Logging Pty Ltd (2023) 278 CLR 99

High Court of Australia held that the peak indebtedness rule does not apply when assessing unfair preferences under s 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

Kozarov v Victoria (2022) 275 CLR 115

An employer owes a duty to take reasonable steps to protect an employee from psychiatric injury caused by vicarious trauma, and may breach that duty by failing to act on obvious warning signs.

Google LLC v Defteros (2022) 276 CLR 362

A search engine operator providing hyperlinks to defamatory content does not thereby publish that content for the purposes of Australian defamation law.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Bird v DP (A Pseudonym) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Bird v DP (A Pseudonym)