← All Authorities
Singapore dishonest assistanceknowing receiptquincecare dutymandatory rules and public policy

BNP Paribas SA v Jacob Agam

[2018] SGHC(I) 3
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore International Commercial Court
Year2018
StatusBinding authority

Summary

SICC held that claims of dishonest assistance and knowing receipt in a banker-customer context require analysis of applicable foreign law governing the underlying obligations.

Key Principle

SICC; banker-customer relationship; dishonest assistance; knowing receipt; foreign law application

Area of Law

commercial

Related Cases

Duties in ASIC v Bekier [2026] 5 March 2026

Unverified authority likely concerning directors' duties and potential breaches under Australian corporations law.

Minister for the Environment and Water v GE Grid Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1609

Likely involves environmental regulatory enforcement proceedings against an energy infrastructure operator in Australia.

Taxi Apps Pty Ltd v Uber Technologies Inc & Ors [2025] VSC 514

Dispute in the ride-sharing industry likely involving competition law or intellectual property claims against Uber Technologies Inc and related parties.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of BNP Paribas SA v Jacob Agam and how it applies to your situation.

Explain BNP Paribas SA v Jacob Agam