← All Authorities
Australia Leading Case uncategorised

Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education v Barclay

(2012) 248 CLR 500
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Year2012
StatusBinding authority

Summary

HCA held that under s.346 Fair Work Act, adverse action is established if a prohibited reason was a substantial and operative cause of the employer's action, assessed objectively.

Key Principle

The HCA held that the test for adverse action under s.346 of the Fair Work Act is objective: the question is whether the prohibited reason was a substantial and operative reason for the action, not whether the decision-maker was conscious of being motivated by the prohibited reason.

Area of Law

employment

Related Cases

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd (2022) 275 CLR 165

Employee/independent contractor characterisation is determined by the legal rights and obligations in the written contract, not the totality of the relationship.

ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek (2022) 275 CLR 215

HCA confirmed that employee/contractor distinction is determined by contractual terms alone, rejecting the multi-factorial totality-of-relationship test.

WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato (2021) 271 CLR 456

A casual employee's status is determined by the contractual terms at engagement; regularity of work pattern does not transform casual employment into permanent employment.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education v Barclay and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Board of Bendigo Regional Inst...