← All Authorities
Singapore Leading Case freezing injunctions mareva

Boustead Trading

(1985) Sdn Bhd v Arab-Malaysian Merchant Bank Berhad [1995] 3 SLR(R) 60
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year1995
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Singapore Court of Appeal set out the requirements for a Mareva injunction, including a good arguable case and real risk of asset dissipation.

Key Principle

Mareva injunction requirements in SG; real risk of dissipation

Area of Law

Injunctive Relief

Related Cases

Convoy Collateral Ltd v Broad Idea International Ltd [2021] UKPC 24

Freezing injunctions are a free-standing equitable remedy available in support of enforcement, not limited to pending or existing proceedings.

China Medical Technologies Inc (in liq) v Samson Med Tech Ltd [2014] 1 HKLRD 990

Mareva injunction principles, including worldwide freezing orders, applied in the context of HK liquidation proceedings.

Brink's Mat Ltd v Elcombe [1988] 1 WLR 1350

Applicants for without-notice injunctions owe a duty of full and frank disclosure of all material facts, breach of which may lead to discharge of the order.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Boustead Trading and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Boustead Trading