← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case implied termsgood faith and relational contracts

Braganza v BP Shipping Ltd

[2015] UKSC 17
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK Supreme Court
Year2015
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A contractual discretion exercised by one party is subject to an implied term that it will not be exercised irrationally or in bad faith, applying Wednesbury-type rationality principles.

Key Principle

Wednesbury rationality applies to contractual discretions exercised by one party

Area of Law

Contract — Commercial

Related Cases

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Co SA v Cottonex Anstalt [2016] EWCA Civ 789

An innocent party's right to affirm a repudiated contract is subject to a legitimate interest qualification; White & Carter principles apply to limit affirmation in shipping container detention context.

Bunge SA v Nidera BV [2015] UKSC 43

On acceptance of anticipatory repudiation in commodity sales, damages are assessed at the date of acceptance, subject to the innocent party's duty to mitigate.

Yam Seng Pte Ltd v International Trade Corp Ltd [2013] EWHC 111 (QB)

A duty of good faith may be implied into relational contracts as a matter of law or as a term implied in fact.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Braganza v BP Shipping Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Braganza v BP Shipping Ltd