← All Authorities
United States predatory pricingrecoupmentrobinson patman

Brooke Group Ltd v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp

509 U.S. 209 (1993)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Year1993
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

A predatory pricing claim requires proof that prices were below an appropriate measure of cost and that the competitor had a dangerous probability of recouping its investment.

Area of Law

competition

Related Cases

US v Google LLC (Search Antitrust) No. 1:20-cv-03010 (D.D.C. 2024)
Epic Games Inc v Apple Inc (Supreme Court) Nos. 23-337 and 23-344 (cert. denied Jan. 16, 2024)
Epic Games Inc v Apple Inc 67 F.4th 946 (9th Cir. 2023)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Brooke Group Ltd v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Brooke Group Ltd v Brown & Wil...