← All Authorities
United States antitrust injuryclayton act section 4

Brunswick Corp v Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat Inc

429 U.S. 477 (1977)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Year1977
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

antitrust standing; antitrust injury required; injury must be of type antitrust laws were intended to prevent

Area of Law

competition

Related Cases

US v Google LLC (Search Antitrust) No. 1:20-cv-03010 (D.D.C. 2024)
Epic Games Inc v Apple Inc (Supreme Court) Nos. 23-337 and 23-344 (cert. denied Jan. 16, 2024)
Epic Games Inc v Apple Inc 67 F.4th 946 (9th Cir. 2023)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Brunswick Corp v Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat Inc and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Brunswick Corp v Pueblo Bowl-O...