← All Authorities
Australia

Burger King Corporation v Hungry Jack's Pty Ltd

(2001) 69 NSWLR 558
JurisdictionAustralia
Year2001
Statusunclear

Key Principle

Doctrinal subject: burger King History Legal issues Burger King Corporation v Hungry Jack's Pty Ltd Burger King Corp

Area of Law

Contract and Commercial

Related Cases

Turbo Top Ltd v Lee Cheuk Yan (2012) 15 HKCFAR 414

CFA endorsed the business efficacy and officious bystander tests as the applicable tests for implying terms into contracts in Hong Kong.

Ting Kwok Keung v Tam Dick Yuen (2002) 5 HKCFAR 137

In contractual interpretation, surrounding circumstances are admissible as an aid, but evidence of prior negotiations remains excluded.

Flywin Co Ltd v Strong & Associates Ltd (2002) 5 HKCFAR 356

Under the Limitation Ordinance (Cap 347), fraud postpones the running of the limitation period until the plaintiff discovered or could with reasonable diligence have discovered the fraud.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Burger King Corporation v Hungry Jack's Pty Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Burger King Corporation v Hung...