← All Authorities
Singapore waiver and estoppelexpress terms

CAA Technologies Pte Ltd v Newcon Builders Pte Ltd

[2017] 2 SLR 940
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2017
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A party may be estopped by contractual estoppel from asserting facts contrary to what was agreed in the contractual terms.

Key Principle

contractual estoppel; party estopped from asserting facts contrary to contractual terms agreed upon

Area of Law

contract

Related Cases

Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd (2019) 267 CLR 560

On termination of a building contract, a builder may recover reasonable value of work done in restitution, subject to the contract price as a ceiling where work was performed under a valid contract.

Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2016) 258 CLR 525

Bank late payment fees are not penalties where they represent a genuine pre-estimate of loss or protect a legitimate interest of the stipulating party.

Simic v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation (2016) 260 CLR 85

High Court of Australia examined the principles governing rectification of written contracts for common intention and unilateral mistake in equity.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of CAA Technologies Pte Ltd v Newcon Builders Pte Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain CAA Technologies Pte Ltd v New...