← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case penalty clauses and liquidated damages

Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi

[2015] UKSC 67
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK Supreme Court
Year2015
StatusBinding authority

Summary

The UKSC reformulated the penalty clause rule, replacing the Dunlop test with a legitimate interest test asking whether the clause is extravagant or unconscionable relative to that interest.

Key Principle

penalty clauses reformulated; legitimate interest test replaces Dunlop

Area of Law

Contract — Breach and Remedies

Related Cases

Transfield Shipping Inc v Mercator Shipping Inc (The Achilleas) [2008] UKHL 48

Remoteness of damage in contract may depend on whether the defendant assumed responsibility for the type of loss, not merely reasonable contemplation.

Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha (The Golden Victory) [2007] UKHL 12

Where a charterparty was repudiated, damages are assessed by reference to subsequent events that would have terminated the contract early, reducing the award accordingly.

Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1996] AC 344

Where cost of cure is disproportionate to benefit obtained, damages for defective performance may be limited to diminution in value or loss of amenity rather than cost of reinstatement.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Cavendish Square Holding BV v ...