← All Authorities
Singapore oppositionmarks similarity

Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd

[2017] 2 SLR 308
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2017
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

The SGCA clarified the marks-similarity inquiry in trademark opposition: the court considers visual, aural, and conceptual similarity, and a high degree of similarity in one element can outweigh differences in others.

Area of Law

ip

Related Cases

Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd [2020] SGHC 26
Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc v Drug Houses of Australia Pte Ltd [2019] 2 SLR 1017
Global Yellow Pages Ltd v Promedia Directories Pte Ltd [2017] 2 SLR 185

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesars...