← All Authorities
Singapore interim injunctions american cyanamid

Challenger Technologies Ltd v Dennison Transoceanic Corporation

[2015] 3 SLR 901
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore High Court
Year2015
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Singapore High Court applied American Cyanamid principles to interlocutory injunction applications, confirming the balance of convenience test.

Key Principle

American Cyanamid applied in Singapore for interlocutory injunctions; balance of convenience test

Area of Law

Injunctive Relief

Related Cases

Convoy Collateral Ltd v Broad Idea International Ltd [2021] UKPC 24

Freezing injunctions are a free-standing equitable remedy available in support of enforcement, not limited to pending or existing proceedings.

China Medical Technologies Inc (in liq) v Samson Med Tech Ltd [2014] 1 HKLRD 990

Mareva injunction principles, including worldwide freezing orders, applied in the context of HK liquidation proceedings.

Brink's Mat Ltd v Elcombe [1988] 1 WLR 1350

Applicants for without-notice injunctions owe a duty of full and frank disclosure of all material facts, breach of which may lead to discharge of the order.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Challenger Technologies Ltd v Dennison Transoceanic Corporation and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Challenger Technologies Ltd v ...