← All Authorities
Singapore freedom of assemblyproportionalitynuisance

Chee Siok Chin v Attorney-General

[2006] 1 SLR(R) 582; [2005] SGHC 216 (Chee Siok Chin v Minister for Home Affairs)
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtHigh Court of Singapore (V K Rajah J)
Year2006
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Chee Siok Chin v Attorney-General [2006] SGHC 153 (Belinda Ang J) held that there is no constitutional right to a full trial in open court in defamation actions, and that the 1991 deletion of O 14 r 1(2) of the Rules of the Supreme Court (which had barred summary judgment in defamation suits) was validly made and did not breach natural justice or the Constitution. The stated public-order/Article 14/proportionality principle does NOT belong to this case; it is the holding of the SEPARATE decision Chee Siok Chin v Minister for Home Affairs [2006] 1 SLR(R) 582 ([2005] SGHC 216, V K Rajah J).

Area of Law

constitutional

Related Cases

Tan Seng Kee v Attorney-General [2022] 1 SLR 1347; [2022] SGCA 16
Ong Ming Johnson v Attorney-General [2020] SGHC 63
Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General [2020] 1 SLR 586

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Chee Siok Chin v Attorney-General and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Chee Siok Chin v Attorney-Gene...