← All Authorities
Hong Kong grounds procedural improprietyamenability and standing

Cheung Tat Ming v Council of the Law Society of Hong Kong [2025] HKCFI 5383

[2025] HKCFI 5383
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of First Instance
Year2025
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Court examined whether a regulatory council may adjudicate disciplinary matters concerning one of its own members, raising procedural impropriety and bias concerns.

Key Principle

The case addressed whether a regulatory council can judge one of its own members, challenging the decision of the Council of the Law Society.

Area of Law

public-law

Related Cases

CPCF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 255 CLR 514

The Maritime Powers Act 2013 authorised detention and return of asylum seekers at sea; executive power extends to removal of non-citizens from Australian waters.

Isbester v Knox City Council (2015) 255 CLR 135

A reasonable apprehension of bias arises where a council officer who lodged a complaint against a dog owner also participated in the decision to order destruction of the dog.

Plaintiff M47/2012 v Director-General of Security (2012) 251 CLR 1

Ministerial power to detain and remove non-citizens under the Migration Act must be exercised in accordance with the Act; adverse ASIO security assessments do not compel indefinite detention.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Cheung Tat Ming v Council of the Law Society of Hong Kong [2025] HKCFI 5383 and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Cheung Tat Ming v Council of t...