← All Authorities
Australia
Leading Case
uncategorized
Chidiac v The Queen
[1991] HCA 4; (1991) 171 CLR 432
Key Principle
On an appeal alleging an unsafe or unsatisfactory verdict, the appellate court asks whether on the whole of the evidence it was open to the jury to be satisfied of guilt beyond reasonable doubt / whether the jury was bound to have a reasonable doubt.
Area of Law
c
Related Cases
Miller v The Queen [2016] HCA 30; (2016) 259 CLR 380 (Miller v The Queen; Smith v The Queen; Presley v DPP (SA))
Ask CommonBench about this case
Get a detailed analysis of Chidiac v The Queen and how it applies to your situation.
Explain Chidiac v The Queen