← All Authorities
Australia avermentsexcisestatutory interpretation

Chief Executive Officer of Customs v El Hajje

(2005) 224 CLR 159
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Year2005
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

An averment provision (Excise Act 1901 (Cth) s 144) renders the matter averred prima facie evidence of that matter; there is no textual basis for excluding the 'ultimate fact in issue' from what may be averred, but an averment of a matter of mixed fact and law is prima facie evidence of the fact only and does not relieve the prosecution of the ultimate burden of proof.

Area of Law

evidence

Related Cases

IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300
Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588
Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Chief Executive Officer of Customs v El Hajje and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Chief Executive Officer of Cus...