← All Authorities
Hong Kong Leading Case cross border insolvencyliquidation voluntary and compulsory

China Medical Technologies Inc v Samson

[2019] HKCFA 17
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of Final Appeal
Year2019
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Liquidators have standing to bring claims on behalf of a company in liquidation; HK cross-border insolvency recognition follows common law modified universalism.

Key Principle

Standing of liquidators to bring claims on behalf of company in liquidation. Cross-border insolvency recognition in Hong Kong follows common law modified universalism.

Area of Law

insolvency

Related Cases

Stubbings v Jams 2 International Pty Ltd (2022) 399 ALR 409

In unfair preference claims, payments and supplies within a continuing business relationship are assessed as a whole under the running account principle, not individually.

Stubbings v Jams 2 Pty Ltd (2022) 276 CLR 233

HCA held that a creditor's statutory demand under s.459E Corporations Act cannot be set aside merely because the company disputes the debt; a genuine dispute on substantial grounds must be shown.

Vince v ASIC [2021] FCAFC 69

Director disqualification upheld where director failed to maintain adequate books and records, constituting misconduct in management of insolvent company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of China Medical Technologies Inc v Samson and how it applies to your situation.

Explain China Medical Technologies Inc...