← All Authorities
Singapore rhc order 14 summary judgment

Ching Mun Fong v Liu Cho Chit

[2001] 1 SLR(R) 856
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2001
StatusBinding authority

Summary

On an O.14 summary judgment application, the defendant must show a triable issue or fair and reasonable probability of a real defence to avoid judgment.

Key Principle

summary judgment under former O.14; defendant must show triable issue or fair and reasonable probability of defence

Area of Law

Procedure

Related Cases

Chinachem Charitable Foundation Ltd v Chan Chun Chuen (2011) 14 HKCFAR 798

In high-value civil fraud cases the standard of proof remains balance of probabilities, but cogency of evidence required is commensurate with the gravity of the allegation.

Secretary for Justice v Ocean Technology Ltd [2007] HKCA 204

Court will only strike out pleadings under O 18 r 19 in plain and obvious cases where the claim or defence is unarguable.

O 14 summary judgment: National Westminster Finance NZ Ltd v National Mortgage and Agency Co of NZ Ltd [1988] 1 NZLR 547

On Order 14 summary judgment, the plaintiff must show the defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Ching Mun Fong v Liu Cho Chit and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Ching Mun Fong v Liu Cho Chit