← All Authorities
United States Leading Case grounds irrationality

Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v Volpe

401 US 402 (1971)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year1971
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Courts review federal agency action under the arbitrary-and-capricious standard, requiring consideration of relevant factors and absence of clear error of judgment, while remaining narrow in scope.

Key Principle

Courts review agency action under the arbitrary and capricious standard, examining whether the agency considered the relevant factors and whether there was a clear error of judgment; the review is searching and careful but narrow.

Area of Law

public-law

Related Cases

CPCF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 255 CLR 514

The Maritime Powers Act 2013 authorised detention and return of asylum seekers at sea; executive power extends to removal of non-citizens from Australian waters.

Isbester v Knox City Council (2015) 255 CLR 135

A reasonable apprehension of bias arises where a council officer who lodged a complaint against a dog owner also participated in the decision to order destruction of the dog.

Plaintiff M47/2012 v Director-General of Security (2012) 251 CLR 1

Ministerial power to detain and remove non-citizens under the Migration Act must be exercised in accordance with the Act; adverse ASIO security assessments do not compel indefinite detention.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v Volpe and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Citizens to Preserve Overton P...