← All Authorities
United States Leading Case arbitration agreementsappeals

Coinbase Inc v Bielski

599 U.S. 736 (2023)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2023
StatusBinding authority

Summary

District court proceedings must be automatically stayed pending interlocutory appeal of an order denying a motion to compel arbitration under the FAA.

Key Principle

District court proceedings must be stayed pending appeal of order denying motion to compel arbitration. Automatic stay rule adopted under Griggs v Provident.

Area of Law

arbitration

Related Cases

Rinehart v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd (2019) 267 CLR 514

A dispute must be referred to arbitration if it falls within the scope of the arbitration agreement, applying a generous interpretation in favour of arbitrability.

TCL Air Conditioner v Judges of the Federal Court (Arbitral Awards) [2013] HCA 5

Enforcement of international commercial arbitral awards does not involve arbitrators exercising judicial power; enforcement itself is a judicial function constitutionally vested in Chapter III courts.

Re Shift Energy Asia Limited [2025] HKCFI 6415

Court considered how the Guy Lam discretion operates where the existence of an arbitration agreement is itself in dispute.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Coinbase Inc v Bielski and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Coinbase Inc v Bielski