← All Authorities
United Kingdom uncategorized

Combe v Combe

[1951] 2 KB 215; [1951] 1 All ER 767 (CA)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtCourt of Appeal (England and Wales)
Year1951
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

Promissory estoppel operates only as a defence ('a shield not a sword'): it may prevent a party enforcing strict legal rights inconsistently with a promise relied upon, but it cannot create a new cause of action where none would otherwise exist, and does not dispense with the requirement of consideration to found a claim.

Area of Law

c

Related Cases

Statoil ASA v Louis Dreyfus Energy Services LP [2008] EWHC 2257 (Comm); [2008] 2 Lloyd's Rep 685; [2008] 2 CLC 520
Statoil ASA v Louis Dreyfus Energy Services LP (The Harriette N) [2008] EWHC 2257 (Comm); [2008] 2 Lloyd's Rep 685; [2009] 1 All ER (Comm) 1035
R v Rahman [2008] UKHL 45; [2009] 1 AC 129; [2008] 3 WLR 264; [2008] 4 All ER 351

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Combe v Combe and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Combe v Combe