← All Authorities
Australia Leading Case parliamentary sovereigntyseparation of powers

Combet v Commonwealth

(2005) 224 CLR 1
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Year2005
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Commonwealth appropriation legislation must specifically authorise executive spending; general appropriation does not validate government advertising campaigns lacking statutory purpose.

Key Principle

spending power; government advertising campaign about WorkChoices; appropriation; executive power limits

Area of Law

constitutional

Related Cases

NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs (2023) 97 ALJR 1005

Indefinite administrative detention of a non-citizen with no real prospect of removal is unlawful as punitive and contrary to Ch III of the Australian Constitution, overruling Al-Kateb v Godwin.

Farm Transparency International v NSW (2022) 276 CLR 81

HCA upheld NSW ag-gag laws as valid notwithstanding a burden on the implied freedom of political communication, applying the structured proportionality test.

Palmer v Western Australia (2021) 272 CLR 505

HCA upheld WA COVID-19 border closure legislation as valid under s.92, finding restrictions on interstate movement were reasonably necessary and proportionate to protect public health.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Combet v Commonwealth and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Combet v Commonwealth