← All Authorities
Australia Leading Case uncategorised

Commissioner of Taxation v Stone

(2005) 222 CLR 289
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Year2005
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Prize money and government grants received by an Olympic athlete constituted assessable income from a business of athletic endeavour under Australian tax law.

Key Principle

assessable income; Olympic athlete; prize money and government grants; whether personal exertion income

Area of Law

tax

Related Cases

Commissioner of Taxation v Consolidated Media Holdings Ltd (2012) 250 CLR 503

Statutory interpretation in tax law requires ascertaining meaning from text, context and purpose; beneficial construction favouring taxpayer is not appropriate.

Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Consolidated Media Holdings Ltd (Statutory Construction) [2012] HCA 55

Tax legislation is construed by giving words their ordinary meaning in context; legislative purpose resolves ambiguity but cannot override clear statutory language.

Aid/Watch Inc v Commissioner of Taxation (2010) 241 CLR 539

An organisation engaged in political advocacy and law reform can qualify as charitable, as generating public debate on matters of public interest satisfies the public benefit requirement.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Commissioner of Taxation v Stone and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Commissioner of Taxation v Sto...