United States appropriations clauseagency fundingseparation of powers

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v Community Financial Services Association

601 U.S. 416 (2024)

JurisdictionUnited States

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

Year2024

StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

The Appropriations Clause is satisfied by any law that authorizes expenditures from a specified source of public money for designated purposes, and the CFPB's standing draw of funds from the Federal Reserve System (subject to a statutory cap) is therefore constitutional.

Area of Law

constitutional

Related Cases

Trump v Anderson Trump v. Anderson, 601 U.S. 100 (2024)

Rahimi v United States United States v. Rahimi, 602 U.S. 680 (2024) (No. 22-915)

United States v Rahimi (DV Firearms) 602 U.S. 680 (2024)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v Community Financial Services Association and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Consumer Financial Protection ...