← All Authorities
United Kingdom

Cramaso LLP v Ogilvie-Grant, Earl of Seafield

[2014] UKSC 9
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
Year2014
Statusunclear

Key Principle

A pre-contractual representation is treated as continuing until the contract is concluded; where the representor becomes aware that the representation has become false before the representee enters the contract, the representor must correct it, and the representee can rely on the (now-uncorrected) representation even if the contracting party (here an LLP) was not yet in existence at the time of the original statement.

Area of Law

Contract — pre-contractual misrepresentation — continuing representations

Related Cases

Maxamcorp International S.L. v Eurotel LLC [2026] EWHC 666
Celestial Aviation Services Ltd v UniCredit Bank GmbH [2026] UKSC 10
R.L. and Republic of Zimbabwe v. Border Timbers Ltd [2026] UKSC 9

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Cramaso LLP v Ogilvie-Grant, Earl of Seafield and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Cramaso LLP v Ogilvie-Grant, E...