← All Authorities
Australia Leading Case duty of carepublic authority liability

Crimmins v Stevedoring Industry Finance Committee

(1999) 200 CLR 1
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Year1999
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A statutory authority owes a duty of care to workers where it had power to protect them from known risks (asbestos exposure) and they were vulnerable and reliant on it.

Key Principle

duty of care; government body; statutory authority; vulnerability; known risk of asbestos exposure

Area of Law

tort

Related Cases

Bird v DP (A Pseudonym) (2024) 98 ALJR 486

High Court of Australia held a religious organisation vicariously liable for sexual abuse by a priest, recognising a relationship akin to employment sufficient to ground vicarious liability.

Bryant v Badenoch Integrated Logging Pty Ltd (2023) 278 CLR 99

High Court of Australia held that the peak indebtedness rule does not apply when assessing unfair preferences under s 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

Kozarov v Victoria (2022) 275 CLR 115

An employer owes a duty to take reasonable steps to protect an employee from psychiatric injury caused by vicarious trauma, and may breach that duty by failing to act on obvious warning signs.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Crimmins v Stevedoring Industry Finance Committee and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Crimmins v Stevedoring Industr...