← All Authorities
Singapore arbitration procedureinterim injunctions american cyanamid

Cuu Long Joint Operating Co v Moody International Ltd

[2015] SGHC 120
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore High Court
Year2015
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Singapore High Court considered grant of interim measures in aid of arbitration under s.12A IAA, examining urgency and necessity requirements for such relief.

Key Principle

interim measures in aid of arbitration under s.12A IAA; urgency and necessity

Area of Law

arbitration

Related Cases

Rinehart v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd (2019) 267 CLR 514

A dispute must be referred to arbitration if it falls within the scope of the arbitration agreement, applying a generous interpretation in favour of arbitrability.

TCL Air Conditioner v Judges of the Federal Court (Arbitral Awards) [2013] HCA 5

Enforcement of international commercial arbitral awards does not involve arbitrators exercising judicial power; enforcement itself is a judicial function constitutionally vested in Chapter III courts.

Re Shift Energy Asia Limited [2025] HKCFI 6415

Court considered how the Guy Lam discretion operates where the existence of an arbitration agreement is itself in dispute.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Cuu Long Joint Operating Co v Moody International Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Cuu Long Joint Operating Co v ...