← All Authorities
Hong Kong rhc order 14 summary judgment

Dah Sing Bank Ltd v Bai Yun Hang

[2010] HKCA 259
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of Appeal
Year2010
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Under O.14, plaintiff must demonstrate defendant has no arguable defence; bare assertions by defendant are insufficient to resist summary judgment.

Key Principle

O.14 summary judgment; plaintiff must show defendant has no arguable defence; mere assertions insufficient

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Dah Sing Bank Ltd v Bai Yun Hang and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Dah Sing Bank Ltd v Bai Yun Ha...