← All Authorities
Australia misleading deceptive conductsilence non disclosure

Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky

Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky (1992) 39 FCR 31; [1992] FCA 557
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtFederal Court of Australia (Full Court)
Year1992
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Silence can amount to misleading or deceptive conduct under s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (now s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law) where, having regard to all the circumstances, there is a reasonable expectation that a particular fact would be disclosed; silence is to be assessed as a circumstance like any other rather than under a distinct 'mere silence' rule.

Area of Law

consumer protection: misleading or deceptive conduct

Related Cases

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Bekier (Liability Judgment) [2026] FCA 196
Hopper & Anor v State of Victoria [2026] HCA 11
Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd & Ors [2026] WASC 101

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky