← All Authorities
United States arbitrary and capriciousdacareliance interests

Department of Homeland Security v Regents of the University of California

591 U.S. 1 (2020)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Year2020
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

DACA rescission was arbitrary and capricious under APA; failed to consider reliance interests

Area of Law

immigration

Related Cases

Department of State v Munoz No. 23-334 (U.S. 2024)
Wilkinson v Garland 601 U.S. 209 (2024)
United States v Texas 599 U.S. 670 (2023)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Department of Homeland Security v Regents of the University of California and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Department of Homeland Securit...