← All Authorities
Singapore banker customer dutyprivate banking duty to adviseassumption of responsibility

Deutsche Bank AG v Chang Tse Wen

[2013] 4 SLR 886; [2013] SGCA 49
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2013
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

A private bank providing execution-only services does not, without more, assume a tortious or pre-contractual duty to advise its customer on the management of his wealth or his investment portfolio; whether any advisory duty of care arises depends on a careful, fact-sensitive analysis of the contractual arrangements and the conduct of the parties, and a 'pre-contractual' duty to advise will not readily be inferred.

Area of Law

tort

Related Cases

Noor Azlin bte Abdul Rahman v Changi General Hospital Pte Ltd [2021] 2 SLR 440
I-Admin (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Hong Ying Ting [2020] 1 SLR 1130
MAN Diesel & Turbo SE v IM Skaugen SE [2019] SGCA 80

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Deutsche Bank AG v Chang Tse Wen and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Deutsche Bank AG v Chang Tse W...